【朱漢平易一包養經驗近】宋學的多元思惟與地區學統

requestId:684c3e446d7de3.38925084.

Song Xue’s Multiple ThoughtsPreparation and regional academic discipline

As soon as we talk about “diversifiedinclusive network thinking”, people will think of hundreds of schools of thought and their respective academic systems during the war in the country. Many students believe that after 彩国大学 After “suppressing all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”, Confucianism became a national academic. Just as the central centralized political system established by Qin and Han lasted for two thousand years, the Confucian unified thinking system established by Western and Han has also been extended until the end of the Qing Dynasty. From a general perspective, this has certain truth, because from Western Han to the late Qing Dynasty, Confucianism has always been used as the form of consciousness and mainstream academics. However, if we look at the history of Chinese thinking civilization for more than two thousand years, we can find that the leading Chinese traditional China has never been a single Confucianism, and the diversified thinking has always been the source of thinking for the group of scholars and experts who produce knowledge. Confucianism, law, Taoism, Buddhism and other doors are not only the source of value and practical thinking for different scholars, but also affect and even guide the thinking and intention at the national level in different levels. At the same time, the diverse concepts and worship of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism have always influenced and led to the traditional community.

This focuses on exploring elite academics. In the development of traditional Chinese science, two diversified ideological forms and civilized formats have been successively constructed. First, the format of multiple coexistence, that is, the multiple coexistence of different ideas such as Confucianism, Law, Taoism, and Buddhism. Age wars are a period of coexistence of hundreds of schools. After Qin inclusive After the Qin Dynasty, despite the unified ideological situation of the unified Empire, it actually preserved the multi-coexistence situation of divergent thinking, including the use of Confucianism and Law in the Han Dynasty and the overlords. The mutual complementation of Confucianism and Taoism in the Wei Dynasty and the natural teachings of the famous religion, and the coexistence of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in the Tang Dynasty can all be regarded as a civilized format with diverse coexistence. Second, a diverse format is compatible with multi-dimensional thinking with a single Confucianism. The revival of Confucianism and the reconstruction of Confucianism during the Song Dynasty promoted Confucianism to become a kind of academic form that was used in a clear way, greatly expanded the ideological scope and theoretical depth of Confucianism, and made Confucianism develop more abundant civilization and political effectiveness. The reconstruction of Confucianism in the Song Dynasty was originally intended to meet the diverse ideological needs of the transformation of the Tang and Song dynasties, and the colorful Song school has truly met the diversified needs of the transformation of the political and educational situation. Just as the multi-dimensional thinking of all schools of thought was nurtured from the political and religious civilization of the Western Zhou Dynasty, the scholars and officials of the Song Dynasty nurtured the multi-dimensional thinking of “schoolism rises everywhere” through the revival of the Confucianism. If it is said that Song Dynasty is the oldestThe academic feature of night is to understand the meaning, so its most important thinking feature is to express the diversity of scholars and scholars through a single transformation of Confucianism.

After the rejuvenation of Confucianism between the Tang and Song dynasties, especially the reconstruction of Confucianism by scholars and scholars of the Song Dynasty, Confucianism was finally realized in the academic and teaching circles. Since then, Confucianism during the disagreement between the Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties has always adhered to the main body of Chinese academic civilization without changing. Observing the characteristics of the evolution and development of Chinese academic civilization around the Song Dynasty, there are obvious differences. Before the Song Dynasty, the Chinese academic form expressed the conflict and storm of different thinking doors such as Confucianism, Law, Taoism, and Buddhism. The pre-Qin school of thought, the legalists of the Qin Dynasty, the Confucianism and Law of the Han Dynasty, the Confucianism and Taoism of the Wei Dynasty, the Confucianism and Taoism of the Sui and Tang Dynasties and Buddhism of the Sui and Tang Dynasties had to be regarded as representatives of China’s serious emphasis on academic thoughts and main thinking forms. In the Song Dynasty, the main position of Confucianism was established from the beginning. Song Dynasty became a “new Confucianism” that could be compatible with the diverse thinking of Confucianism, Law, Taoism, Buddhism, etc., and at the same time preserved the value and worship of Confucianism and the academic system. After the Song Dynasty, the development of Chinese academic history became a revolution and development of Confucianism itself. The study of the Ming Dynasty, the study of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, and the study of the Qing Dynasty were actually changes within Confucianism, and they had a close source of thinking and academic management. It can even be said that the development of Confucianism after the Song Dynasty was a transformation of a certain school or a certain characteristic of the Song Dynasty. For example, the relationship between the Ming Dynasty’s mental thoughts and the Xiangshan School of the Southern Song Dynasty, the relationship between the Ming and Qing Dynasty’s modern realities and the utilita