-
- admin
- 15.07.2025
【張晚林】論《太極圖說》消極的一包養app形而上學架構
requestId:68753c32ef84d0.60252602.
About the metaphysical structure of “Taiyang Pictures”
Author: Zhang Wanlin
Source: Author’s draft, original “Xiangnan Academy Newspaper” 2024 Issue 6
Content summary:The reason why Zhu Zi valued “Taiyang Pictures” is because it is a metaphysical structure. However, because the “Taifeng” in the original body of “Taifeng Picture” is a thinking object, the metaphysical learning constructed by Lianxi is an eliminating metaphysical learning; this eliminating metaphysical learning makes the plan of Lianxi combining moral and cosmic theory and constructing moral metaphysical learning in one fell swoop. To truly complete the metaphysical structure of morality, the metaphysical body must be transformed into a Copernican-style twist, that is, from the “unexpected” of thinking about things, it is transformed into a veritable “heart”, which is an impulsive metaphysical study.
Keywords: “Taifeng Pictures” Taifeng Metaphysical Learning Since
1. Metaphysical Learning and Zhu Zi’s importance to “Taifeng Pictures”
Although Lianxi was the teacher of the second Chengs, the second Chengs had a good understanding of Lianxi’s learning, which truly made Lianxi’s learning value the world. Wufeng, Zhu Zi and Nanhua. Wufeng wrote a “Preface to the General Book”, which specifically praised Lianxi’s “Tong Book”, and there was a microcosm in “Taijin Diagrams”, saying that “the way that sages can do nothing and have nothing to do, and it seems that there are not yet arrived”[1]117. As for Zhu Zi, he combined the “Taijin Diagrams” with “Tong Shu”. His “Taijin Diagrams” says: “The master’s learning is wonderful in the picture of “Taijin”. The words of “Tong Shu” all come out of this “Taijin Diagrams”. “[1]44 In this way, in terms of Lianxi’s learning, “Taijin Diagrams” means “repeated”, while “Tong Shu” means “translation”; it seems that “Taijin Diagrams” are Baobao.com said that “https://sites.google.com” is more important than “Tongshu”. However, where is the “magic” in “Taijin Picture”? Zhu Zi engraved the “Taiyu Pictures” and added the “Affiliated Notes”:
Xi’s thought that this “Picture” was based on the meaning of the symbols and analysis of the subtleties, and Zhou Zili had no choice but to write it. Seeing his intention of teaching and receiving, he thought that only Cheng Zi could serve him. When he arrived at Chengzi, he did not speak, and he suspected that he had not been able to accept it. Since you have not been able to understand the expression of words and meanings, you will be able to express your mind and make your mind empty and wonderful, and you will be able to express your feelings without saying anything. After watching his “Answer Zhang Guanzhong” and his “Yi Ji” written by the book “Yi Ji” and his deep concerns about the fact that the “Tong Juan” said that the “Heng Qu Qing Du” was about the year-night walk, so that people would just respect each other, and the meaning could be seen. If “Xi Yan” recommends people to use the heavens, it is to be clear and far away in the near future, and it is the most important thing for students to use daily use. It is not just that this book focuses on the origin of life and is briefly aimed at the goal of progress, and there is no way to speak it with a way. Confucius’ elegant words “Pen Shu”, “Book”, and “Travel”, and “Travel” were explained in detail in the “Book of Changes”. The meaning is also like this. [1]11-12
>
The Dongyou Records discusses “Qingxian for one year” two articles: “The Qingxian for one year is the source of all things, and I am afraid that I am not at ease. I must also be clear and quiet, but I can speak of the gods. The Taoist objects are not free, and they should not be in no place.” [2]21 “The sacred teachings are just a solid world, so it is said that a Qingxian for one year is enough to make people lose their way. As for the truth, people don’t leave. I will only respect this day.”[2]34 Yichuan replied to Zhang Guanzhong’s book: “Reason is invisible, so we can understand the truth by the image. Since the reason is clear, we can use the image to view the image.”[2]615 According to Zhu Zi’s intention, the Taiji Painting (Speaking) wanted to “establish the image and analyze the subtlety.” But what is “meaning”? Where is the “slight”? It is the “origin of life”. This is what the “Taiyu Picture (Say)” describes the “Book of Changes”, not just in terms of the physical behavior and virtue. Originally, after studying the theory of the second journey, he focused on the four books. He did not only care about the life system of the universe of the Book of Changes, but he was not very careful about it. Therefore, Yichuan said: “Therefore, it is obtained from the energy, the movement of the mind, the virtue of the six combinations, the brightness of the sun and the moon, the order of the four periods, and the auspiciousness of the ghosts and gods, and then you can know the “Book of Changes””[2]690. This means that when the “Yi” contains the Lord’s respectful words from the “work of energy, movement of mind”, it is not in the words of the rebirth system of the universe’s theory, and “Taiyang PictureSweetheart Baobaobaobaobao.com (Speak)” is the latter, so Cheng Zi did not teach the doorman with “Taifeng Picture (Speak)”. Zhu Zi thought that there was no one in Cheng Men. This is a strong statement and guesswork, and it is not true. Therefore, in the Northern Song Dynasty, the “Taifeng Picture (Speak)” finally became silent, and it was not until Zhu Zi of the Southern Song Dynasty began to pay attention. So, why did Zhu Zi turn the two processes and reiterate the “Taiyang Picture (Speaking)”? The above paragraph may give a brief explanation of the answer to the doorman:
Question: “Did Zhou Zi see it first?” He said: “I haven’t seen it yet. However, Master Zhou has high talent and does not want to see that the above skills are not very big. Now students must learn the science courses from the bottom. If they don’t get to the top, they will not be able to learn. . It must be to reach the top and come down from the top.”[3]3104
According to Zhu Zi, studying hard is like pursuing cultivation and respect. If you cannot achieve the top level when you are down, learning questions will never be a brain, and it will not be a learning question. “Tai Yang Picture (Speaking)” is to let people know a top level, so that learning can understand the high and low level. In this way, Zhu Zi spent a lot of time to annotate the “Taisheng Picture (Speaking)” and thought that this task was very important, and he was satisfied. “Liangxi wrote “Taisheng Picture”. If there are many festivals, how can I read it? Is it unknown if future generations can look at it in detail?”[3]3141. The so-called “top” is the “origin of life”, that is, the nature and life of all things in the world博官网 can be called cosmic theory.
2. “Taiyang” is a metaphysical learning of thinking about matters and elimination
The current problem is that as a metaphysical problem, where is the beginning of the universe? This is certainly not something that can be solved by science, because it is a pure metaphysical problem. The “invisible and magnificent” in “Taiyang Figure (Say)” is such a morphology The question of learning the first study. Zhu Zi specially introduced Cheng Zi’s “Tongyou Record” and “Answer Zhangguanzhong” to tell us that this “original origin of life” is neither a thing that is invisible nor the origin of “empty and wonderful” in Buddhism and Taoism. That is, Zhu Zi wanted to introduce “no and too extreme” to the metaphysical study of Confucianism, that is, Confucianism The origin. But the question is, if “no extreme and too extreme” is a metaphysical problem of pure cosmic theory, can it remove the stalem of “emptiness and wonder”? Therefore, we should not understand Hegel’s philosophical thinking in this situation. Hegel once asked such a question: “What must be used as the beginning of science? “We first understand that no “thing” cannot be used as such an opening. Hegel said:
No matter there is something or there is nothing, it cannot be used as an opening. Because if there is something, it is not an opening. ——If the world or something should have an opening, it must start in the middle, but the opening is not in the middle, nor is it not in the middle; because the opening itself includes existence, and nothing does not include existence. [4]95
No object in meaning cannot be used as an opening, then the opening is in the midd TC: